2rgx Citations

Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory.

Abstract

The mechanisms by which enzymes achieve extraordinary rate acceleration and specificity have long been of key interest in biochemistry. It is generally recognized that substrate binding coupled to conformational changes of the substrate-enzyme complex aligns the reactive groups in an optimal environment for efficient chemistry. Although chemical mechanisms have been elucidated for many enzymes, the question of how enzymes achieve the catalytically competent state has only recently become approachable by experiment and computation. Here we show crystallographic evidence for conformational substates along the trajectory towards the catalytically competent 'closed' state in the ligand-free form of the enzyme adenylate kinase. Molecular dynamics simulations indicate that these partially closed conformations are sampled in nanoseconds, whereas nuclear magnetic resonance and single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer reveal rare sampling of a fully closed conformation occurring on the microsecond-to-millisecond timescale. Thus, the larger-scale motions in substrate-free adenylate kinase are not random, but preferentially follow the pathways that create the configuration capable of proficient chemistry. Such preferred directionality, encoded in the fold, may contribute to catalysis in many enzymes.

Reviews - 2rgx mentioned but not cited (1)

  1. Mining electron density for functionally relevant protein polysterism in crystal structures. Fraser JS, Jackson CJ. Cell Mol Life Sci 68 1829-1841 (2011)

Articles - 2rgx mentioned but not cited (11)



Reviews citing this publication (86)

  1. Dynamic personalities of proteins. Henzler-Wildman K, Kern D. Nature 450 964-972 (2007)
  2. The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Boehr DD, Nussinov R, Wright PE. Nat Chem Biol 5 789-796 (2009)
  3. Allosteric regulation and catalysis emerge via a common route. Goodey NM, Benkovic SJ. Nat Chem Biol 4 474-482 (2008)
  4. Seven transmembrane receptors as shapeshifting proteins: the impact of allosteric modulation and functional selectivity on new drug discovery. Kenakin T, Miller LJ. Pharmacol Rev 62 265-304 (2010)
  5. Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. Klepeis JL, Lindorff-Larsen K, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19 120-127 (2009)
  6. Binding of small-molecule ligands to proteins: "what you see" is not always "what you get". Mobley DL, Dill KA. Structure 17 489-498 (2009)
  7. Normal mode analysis of biomolecular structures: functional mechanisms of membrane proteins. Bahar I, Lezon TR, Bakan A, Shrivastava IH. Chem Rev 110 1463-1497 (2010)
  8. Protein dynamics and conformational disorder in molecular recognition. Mittag T, Kay LE, Forman-Kay JD. J Mol Recognit 23 105-116 (2010)
  9. Molecular dynamics simulations: advances and applications. Hospital A, Goñi JR, Orozco M, Gelpí JL. Adv Appl Bioinform Chem 8 37-47 (2015)
  10. At the dawn of the 21st century: Is dynamics the missing link for understanding enzyme catalysis? Kamerlin SC, Warshel A. Proteins 78 1339-1375 (2010)
  11. Toward dynamic structural biology: Two decades of single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer. Lerner E, Cordes T, Ingargiola A, Alhadid Y, Chung S, Michalet X, Weiss S. Science 359 eaan1133 (2018)
  12. Synthetic biology for the directed evolution of protein biocatalysts: navigating sequence space intelligently. Currin A, Swainston N, Day PJ, Kell DB. Chem Soc Rev 44 1172-1239 (2015)
  13. Why nature really chose phosphate. Kamerlin SC, Sharma PK, Prasad RB, Warshel A. Q Rev Biophys 46 1-132 (2013)
  14. Protein Ensembles: How Does Nature Harness Thermodynamic Fluctuations for Life? The Diverse Functional Roles of Conformational Ensembles in the Cell. Wei G, Xi W, Nussinov R, Ma B. Chem Rev 116 6516-6551 (2016)
  15. Frustration in biomolecules. Ferreiro DU, Komives EA, Wolynes PG. Q Rev Biophys 47 285-363 (2014)
  16. Enzyme dynamics point to stepwise conformational selection in catalysis. Ma B, Nussinov R. Curr Opin Chem Biol 14 652-659 (2010)
  17. Integrative, dynamic structural biology at atomic resolution--it's about time. van den Bedem H, Fraser JS. Nat Methods 12 307-318 (2015)
  18. Designing artificial enzymes by intuition and computation. Nanda V, Koder RL. Nat Chem 2 15-24 (2010)
  19. Allostery and population shift in drug discovery. Kar G, Keskin O, Gursoy A, Nussinov R. Curr Opin Pharmacol 10 715-722 (2010)
  20. Fuzziness: linking regulation to protein dynamics. Fuxreiter M. Mol Biosyst 8 168-177 (2012)
  21. Gates of enzymes. Gora A, Brezovsky J, Damborsky J. Chem Rev 113 5871-5923 (2013)
  22. Protein functional landscapes, dynamics, allostery: a tortuous path towards a universal theoretical framework. Zhuravlev PI, Papoian GA. Q Rev Biophys 43 295-332 (2010)
  23. Coupled motions in enzyme catalysis. Nashine VC, Hammes-Schiffer S, Benkovic SJ. Curr Opin Chem Biol 14 644-651 (2010)
  24. Biology, one molecule at a time. Kapanidis AN, Strick T. Trends Biochem Sci 34 234-243 (2009)
  25. Alternating-laser excitation: single-molecule FRET and beyond. Hohlbein J, Craggs TD, Cordes T. Chem Soc Rev 43 1156-1171 (2014)
  26. Molecular simulations of protein dynamics: new windows on mechanisms in biology. Dodson GG, Lane DP, Verma CS. EMBO Rep 9 144-150 (2008)
  27. Perspective: Defining and quantifying the role of dynamics in enzyme catalysis. Warshel A, Bora RP. J Chem Phys 144 180901 (2016)
  28. Protein dynamics and function from solution state NMR spectroscopy. Kovermann M, Rogne P, Wolf-Watz M. Q Rev Biophys 49 e6 (2016)
  29. Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics. Maximova T, Moffatt R, Ma B, Nussinov R, Shehu A. PLoS Comput Biol 12 e1004619 (2016)
  30. FRET-based dynamic structural biology: Challenges, perspectives and an appeal for open-science practices. Lerner E, Barth A, Hendrix J, Ambrose B, Birkedal V, Blanchard SC, Börner R, Sung Chung H, Cordes T, Craggs TD, Deniz AA, Diao J, Fei J, Gonzalez RL, Gopich IV, Ha T, Hanke CA, Haran G, Hatzakis NS, Hohng S, Hong SC, Hugel T, Ingargiola A, Joo C, Kapanidis AN, Kim HD, Laurence T, Lee NK, Lee TH, Lemke EA, Margeat E, Michaelis J, Michalet X, Myong S, Nettels D, Peulen TO, Ploetz E, Razvag Y, Robb NC, Schuler B, Soleimaninejad H, Tang C, Vafabakhsh R, Lamb DC, Seidel CA, Weiss S. Elife 10 e60416 (2021)
  31. Choreographing an enzyme's dance. Villali J, Kern D. Curr Opin Chem Biol 14 636-643 (2010)
  32. Understanding biomolecular motion, recognition, and allostery by use of conformational ensembles. Fenwick RB, Esteban-Martín S, Salvatella X. Eur Biophys J 40 1339-1355 (2011)
  33. Comparing proteins by their internal dynamics: exploring structure-function relationships beyond static structural alignments. Micheletti C. Phys Life Rev 10 1-26 (2013)
  34. Essential role of conformational selection in ligand binding. Vogt AD, Pozzi N, Chen Z, Di Cera E. Biophys Chem 186 13-21 (2014)
  35. Conformational selection in protein binding and function. Weikl TR, Paul F. Protein Sci 23 1508-1518 (2014)
  36. Biomolecularmodeling and simulation: a field coming of age. Schlick T, Collepardo-Guevara R, Halvorsen LA, Jung S, Xiao X. Q Rev Biophys 44 191-228 (2011)
  37. Dynamics in electron transfer protein complexes. Bashir Q, Scanu S, Ubbink M. FEBS J 278 1391-1400 (2011)
  38. Visualizing lowly-populated regions of the free energy landscape of macromolecular complexes by paramagnetic relaxation enhancement. Clore GM. Mol Biosyst 4 1058-1069 (2008)
  39. Quantitative analysis of protein-ligand interactions by NMR. Furukawa A, Konuma T, Yanaka S, Sugase K. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 96 47-57 (2016)
  40. Role of conformational dynamics in the evolution of novel enzyme function. Maria-Solano MA, Serrano-Hervás E, Romero-Rivera A, Iglesias-Fernández J, Osuna S. Chem Commun (Camb) 54 6622-6634 (2018)
  41. Exploring sparsely populated states of macromolecules by diamagnetic and paramagnetic NMR relaxation. Clore GM. Protein Sci 20 229-246 (2011)
  42. A theoretical view of protein dynamics. Orozco M. Chem Soc Rev 43 5051-5066 (2014)
  43. Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches. Tuffery P, Derreumaux P. J R Soc Interface 9 20-33 (2012)
  44. Optimization protocols and improved strategies of cross-linked enzyme aggregates technology: current development and future challenges. Cui JD, Jia SR. Crit Rev Biotechnol 35 15-28 (2015)
  45. Surfing on a new wave of single-molecule fluorescence methods. Hohlbein J, Gryte K, Heilemann M, Kapanidis AN. Phys Biol 7 031001 (2010)
  46. Computer aided enzyme design and catalytic concepts. Frushicheva MP, Mills MJ, Schopf P, Singh MK, Prasad RB, Warshel A. Curr Opin Chem Biol 21 56-62 (2014)
  47. Importance of protein dynamics during enzymatic C-H bond cleavage catalysis. Klinman JP. Biochemistry 52 2068-2077 (2013)
  48. Direct and Propagated Effects of Small Molecules on Protein-Protein Interaction Networks. Cesa LC, Mapp AK, Gestwicki JE. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 3 119 (2015)
  49. Macromolecular NMR spectroscopy for the non-spectroscopist: beyond macromolecular solution structure determination. Bieri M, Kwan AH, Mobli M, King GF, Mackay JP, Gooley PR. FEBS J 278 704-715 (2011)
  50. Single molecule insights on conformational selection and induced fit mechanism. Hatzakis NS. Biophys Chem 186 46-54 (2014)
  51. Sizing up single-molecule enzymatic conformational dynamics. Lu HP. Chem Soc Rev 43 1118-1143 (2014)
  52. Hybrid Approaches to Structural Characterization of Conformational Ensembles of Complex Macromolecular Systems Combining NMR Residual Dipolar Couplings and Solution X-ray Scattering. Venditti V, Egner TK, Clore GM. Chem Rev 116 6305-6322 (2016)
  53. Unified understanding of folding and binding mechanisms of globular and intrinsically disordered proteins. Arai M. Biophys Rev 10 163-181 (2018)
  54. Artificial enzymes with protein scaffolds: structural design and modification. Matsuo T, Hirota S. Bioorg Med Chem 22 5638-5656 (2014)
  55. Real-Time 3D Single Particle Tracking: Towards Active Feedback Single Molecule Spectroscopy in Live Cells. Hou S, Johnson C, Welsher K. Molecules 24 E2826 (2019)
  56. Fluorescence-based analysis of enzymes at the single-molecule level. Blank K, De Cremer G, Hofkens J. Biotechnol J 4 465-479 (2009)
  57. Moving beyond static snapshots: Protein dynamics and the Protein Data Bank. Miller MD, Phillips GN. J Biol Chem 296 100749 (2021)
  58. Toward a molecular understanding of the interaction of dual specificity phosphatases with substrates: insights from structure-based modeling and high throughput screening. Bakan A, Lazo JS, Wipf P, Brummond KM, Bahar I. Curr Med Chem 15 2536-2544 (2008)
  59. Retinal conformation and dynamics in activation of rhodopsin illuminated by solid-state H NMR spectroscopy. Brown MF, Martínez-Mayorga K, Nakanishi K, Salgado GF, Struts AV. Photochem Photobiol 85 442-453 (2009)
  60. Development of free-energy-based models for chaperonin containing TCP-1 mediated folding of actin. Altschuler GM, Willison KR. J R Soc Interface 5 1391-1408 (2008)
  61. The locks and keys to industrial biotechnology. Wohlgemuth R. N Biotechnol 25 204-213 (2009)
  62. Mechanisms of ligand binding. Di Cera E. Biophys Rev (Melville) 1 011303 (2020)
  63. There and back again: new single-molecule insights in the motion of DNA repair proteins. Spies M. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23 154-160 (2013)
  64. A perspective on conformational control of electron transfer in nitric oxide synthases. Hedison TM, Hay S, Scrutton NS. Nitric Oxide 63 61-67 (2017)
  65. Computational protein engineering: bridging the gap between rational design and laboratory evolution. Barrozo A, Borstnar R, Marloie G, Kamerlin SC. Int J Mol Sci 13 12428-12460 (2012)
  66. Conformational heterogeneity within the LID domain mediates substrate binding to Escherichia coli adenylate kinase: function follows fluctuations. Schrank TP, Wrabl JO, Hilser VJ. Top Curr Chem 337 95-121 (2013)
  67. An overview of recent molecular dynamics applications as medicinal chemistry tools for the undruggable site challenge. Perricone U, Gulotta MR, Lombino J, Parrino B, Cascioferro S, Diana P, Cirrincione G, Padova A. Medchemcomm 9 920-936 (2018)
  68. Tripping the light fantastic in membrane redox biology: linking dynamic structures to function in ER electron transfer chains. Hedison TM, Scrutton NS. FEBS J 286 2004-2017 (2019)
  69. Improving FRET-based monitoring of single chemomechanical rotary motors at work. Börsch M, Wrachtrup J. Chemphyschem 12 542-553 (2011)
  70. Shedding light on protein folding, structural and functional dynamics by single molecule studies. Bavishi K, Hatzakis NS. Molecules 19 19407-19434 (2014)
  71. Allosteric activation transitions in enzymes and biomolecular motors: insights from atomistic and coarse-grained simulations. Daily MD, Yu H, Phillips GN, Cui Q. Top Curr Chem 337 139-164 (2013)
  72. Protein dynamics and enzyme catalysis: the ghost in the machine? Glowacki DR, Harvey JN, Mulholland AJ. Biochem Soc Trans 40 515-521 (2012)
  73. Seeing the forest for the trees: fluorescence studies of single enzymes in the context of ensemble experiments. Tan YW, Yang H. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13 1709-1721 (2011)
  74. Self-organization, entropy and allostery. Kornev AP. Biochem Soc Trans 46 587-597 (2018)
  75. Single-Molecular Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Measurement on Structures and Interactions of Biomolecules. Qiao Y, Luo Y, Long N, Xing Y, Tu J. Micromachines (Basel) 12 492 (2021)
  76. Advances in methods for atomic resolution macromolecular structure determination. Thompson MC, Yeates TO, Rodriguez JA. F1000Res 9 F1000 Faculty Rev-667 (2020)
  77. Modulating Mobility: a Paradigm for Protein Engineering? McAuley M, Timson DJ. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 181 83-90 (2017)
  78. On the indirect relationship between protein dynamics and enzyme activity. Zhao Q. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 125 52-60 (2017)
  79. Single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer techniques on rotary ATP synthases. Börsch M. Biol Chem 392 135-142 (2011)
  80. Spotlight on the Ballet of Proteins: The Structural Dynamic Properties of Proteins Illuminated by Solution NMR. Tokunaga Y, Viennet T, Arthanari H, Takeuchi K. Int J Mol Sci 21 E1829 (2020)
  81. Does the pressure dependence of kinetic isotope effects report usefully on dynamics in enzyme H-transfer reactions? Hoeven R, Heyes DJ, Hay S, Scrutton NS. FEBS J 282 3243-3255 (2015)
  82. Reciprocally-Coupled Gating: Strange Loops in Bioenergetics, Genetics, and Catalysis. Carter CW, Wills PR. Biomolecules 11 265 (2021)
  83. The Inescapable Effects of Ribosomes on In-Cell NMR Spectroscopy and the Implications for Regulation of Biological Activity. Burz DS, Breindel L, Shekhtman A. Int J Mol Sci 20 E1297 (2019)
  84. Theoretical tools for the design of NMR relaxation dispersion pulse sequences. Salvi N. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 88-89 105-115 (2015)
  85. Perspective: How Fast Dynamics Affect Slow Function in Protein Machines. Haran G, Riven I. J Phys Chem B 127 4687-4693 (2023)
  86. Protein Dynamics and Enzymatic Catalysis. Schwartz SD. J Phys Chem B 127 2649-2660 (2023)

Articles citing this publication (390)